Are companies leaving CodeRabbit for Greptile?

By Jenny Liu, Director of Product @Yipitdata.

In this week’s B2B Spend Signals, we examine the fast-moving AI code review market to highlight movement across Greptile, CodeRabbit, Sourcegraph, Qodo, and Graphite using proprietary spend data from mid-market and enterprise companies.


New Data Signals: Greptile

This month we dramatically expanded coverage on the Signals platform from 65,000 to 250,000 AI and software companies. With the expanded dataset comes deeper visibility into emerging vendors and early category shifts.

One of the most requested additions now live on the platform is Greptile.

Greptile builds AI-powered tools designed to help engineering teams search, understand, and manage large codebases. Its platform automates tasks like code review, error alerts, and issue diagnosis — areas where AI tools are increasingly being deployed to improve developer productivity.

Early spend data on Greptile shows breakout velocity, although from a very small base.

In the last nine months:

  • Customer count grew 4x

  • Average spend increased 8x

  • Average contract value (ACV) sits at $2K

Mid-Market: Greptile vs CodeRabbit, Qodo, Sourcegraph, and Graphite

While Greptile’s growth trajectory is notable, it’s not yet making a noticeable dent in the AI code review market, which appears to split along company size. 

CodeRabbit remains the clear leader on the mid-market side even though adoption slowed near the end of 2025. 

Signals data for CodeRabbit shows:

  • 5x customer growth exiting 2025

  • Mid-market ACV of ~$6.7K as of Dec 2025

Exhibit 1: CodeRabbit dominates AI code review platforms in mid-market, leading both adoption and ACV; Greptile growing but still nascent

Enterprise: Greptile vs Sourcegraph, Graphite, CodeRabbit, and Qodo

Meanwhile, the data shows a different leader on the enterprise side.

Sourcegraph continues to dominate the enterprise segment:

  • Customer count is 2x larger than Graphite

  • Customer count 4x larger than CodeRabbit

  • Enterprise ACVs sit just under $300K, roughly in line with Graphite

This could change though – CodeRabbit began entering the enterprise segment in mid-2025. Its enterprise ACVs currently trail the category leaders, which is consistent with a newer push upmarket but, as the definitive mid-market leader, its growing focus on enterprise could impact the incumbents in the segment

And Greptile doesn’t have any enterprise customers in the dataset yet.

Exhibit 2: Sourcegraph remains the category leader on enterprise side, but CodeRabbit starting to scale; No enterprise customers on Greptile yet

Multi-platform usage for AI code review tools?

Interestingly, multi-platform usage is rare in this category.

Only about 10% of mid-market companies use more than one AI code review tool, suggesting most teams standardize on a single solution rather than running multiple platforms in parallel.

When switching does occur, the data shows it is primarily happening away from Qodo and toward CodeRabbit. None of the Greptile customers in the panel appear to have switched from CodeRabbit.

This suggests that Greptile’s growth may be driven more by new adoption rather than direct competitive displacement.

AI code review market outlook

Taken together, the Signals data points to a market that is growing quickly but segmenting by company size and maturity.

In the mid-market, CodeRabbit dominates both adoption and ACV, suggesting it has established itself as the default option for many development teams. 

At the enterprise level, Sourcegraph remains the clear category leader, with significantly larger customer counts and ACV. But CodeRabbit’s recent push into enterprise suggests the competitive landscape is still evolving.

With no observed switches from CodeRabbit and no enterprise presence yet, Greptile’s expansion likely reflects early experimentation or adoption among smaller teams rather than direct competitive replacement.

As AI developer tooling continues to expand, this dynamic of fast new vendor growth alongside entrenched incumbents will define how the category evolves.

 

Try our platform to access real spend data on private AI and software companies.

FAQ’s

  • According to YipitData Signals spend data, there is currently no evidence of companies switching from CodeRabbit to Greptile within the panel analyzed for this report. Signals tracks software spending across hundreds of mid-market and enterprise companies, and none of the Greptile customers observed in the dataset previously used CodeRabbit. This suggests Greptile’s growth is likely being driven by new adoption rather than direct competitive displacement.

  • Signals spend data shows Greptile is experiencing rapid early growth, although from a small base. Over the last nine months in the dataset, Greptile’s customer count increased roughly 4x while average spend rose approximately 8x. Average contract value currently sits around $2K, indicating that most Greptile deployments so far are among smaller engineering teams or are evidence of early experimentation with AI-powered code review tools.

  • Based on YipitData Signals data, CodeRabbit currently leads the mid-market AI code review category. As of December 2025, CodeRabbit showed roughly 5x customer growth exiting the year and a mid-market average contract value of about $6.7K. These metrics suggest CodeRabbit has established a strong foothold among mid-sized companies adopting AI-assisted code review workflows.

  • Within the Signals enterprise panel, Sourcegraph currently leads the AI code review category. Enterprise customer counts are roughly twice as large as Graphite and about four times larger than CodeRabbit in the dataset. Enterprise deployments also carry significantly larger contract values, with ACVs sitting just under $300K — reflecting the scale of enterprise development environments.

  • YipitData Signals data suggests that multi-platform usage is relatively uncommon. Only about 10% of mid-market companies in the panel use more than one AI code review tool simultaneously. Most engineering teams appear to standardize on a single platform rather than running multiple tools in parallel.

  • According to YipitData Signals data, most company switching appears to be occurring away from Qodo and toward CodeRabbit. Greptile’s growth, meanwhile, appears to come primarily from new customer adoption rather than companies leaving existing platforms like CodeRabbit or Sourcegraph.

  • The insights in this analysis are based on proprietary spend data from the YipitData Signals platform. Signals aggregates anonymized software spending data from a panel of 1,200+ mid-market and enterprise companies to track vendor adoption, customer growth, ACV, and other meaningful data across 250,000 vendors.

 

Explore More Insights

YipitData for Investors

We analyze billions of data points ever day to provide accurate, timely insights on 1,000+ companies

Previous
Previous

February Home Improvement Recap: Retail Trends Across Home Depot, Lowe’s, Best Buy, and Costco

Next
Next

February Beauty Recap: Retail Performance and Category Growth Trends